PhalloBoards - An Online Community to Discuss Penile Girth Enhancement

Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me
  • Page:
  • 1
  • 2

TOPIC: Latest pathology shows 80-90% PMMA in my tissue vs. a normal pattern with Metacrill

Latest pathology shows 80-90% PMMA in my tissue vs. a normal pattern with Metacrill 9 years 9 months ago #1293801922

As a biomed researcher in immunology, I work with pathology all the time. I was actually going to make a comment about the tissue section only representing a single \"picture\" and not being able to tell the size of the particle from this.
A few things that stand out to me or my random thoughts here:- Much less immune cells (macrophages) than I would have expected. -The clustering of the beads, and relative similarity in size of beads, in relation to the old PMMA, really shows how much product you had in such a small area. Even with the limitation of only being able to see a 2d/flat image, and not 3d, you can still see a consistency with product quality. - If there is a consistency in product size, I would think over concentration of product would not be likely. I have always thought that most nodules are due to the limited ability to evenly distribute product via syringe. The \"extra push\" eh? -TGFB-1 is a complex molecule immunologically, but highly doubtful macrophage function would be compromised to the point it would cause any noticeable effect, particularly as you had no signs of enhanced susceptibility to infection.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Latest pathology shows 80-90% PMMA in my tissue vs. a normal pattern with Metacrill 9 years 9 months ago #1293803876

Hi Letsgiveitago, I am having the microdrops next week as the final step on most of my Dick. I had 2 rounds of PMMA and want to finish off with that. Did you have it done all over your Dick or just here and there? - and did it add any Girth at all?

I am not expecting much but I recall Wade saying you could get about .2 but it is not really a Girth procedure- so just curious.

Restoration sorry for hijacking your thread but LGIAG has his PM off.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Latest pathology shows 80-90% PMMA in my tissue vs. a normal pattern with Metacrill 9 years 9 months ago #1293838729

Restoration I have a question about what you meant in the statement below.
\"I did find out that injecting saline or CMC would have gotten the PMMA out of there and saved me the last 1.5 years of hell though (when my appointment was cancelled for no reason). \" did you find out that saline would get PMMA out?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Latest pathology shows 80-90% PMMA in my tissue vs. a normal pattern with Metacrill 9 years 9 months ago #1293844252

When I had Mrs. Bum Bum\'s lawyer, they said this to me. I hired them in Brazil to sue Lebon for the defective PMMA, not Avanti - as I still do not believe Avanti is at fault when I look at the slides. I remain convinced the product had a problem, particularly since I reacted so strangely in weeks 1-2 vs. metacrill. It was an expert witness statement in Mrs. Bum Bum\'s case (about the saline or CMC) - but it was in context of a larger deposition he gave (not in English, but I had a few people read it and translate it clearly to English, aside from google translate).

In the first 2 weeks, the PMMA wasn\'t surrounded by much collagen yet - just early inflammatory cells. It was still immature and could have been \"washed out\" per this one doctor / witness. That\'s only 1 doctor\'s opinion, and he could have been wrong - but if the 6 entry points were opened again and filled with 30-50 cc saline or CMC and then allowed to drain out for many days, it seems logical that it would\'ve diluted down the Linnea Safe...at least, logical to me. Working with this firm was not easy as I do not speak Portuguese and they were very expensive. So, I just got bits and pieces of info (some I cannot share unfortunately - but it\'s not that interesting anyway) and then I felt like it was enough. An actual lawsuit against Lebon would cost 10k (minimum) in fees, court costs and travel expenses and I wouldn\'t win for a variety of reasons (cosmetic procedures are seen as \"you did it to yourself\" in a judge / jury\'s mind, proving I had a \"bad batch\" is very difficult from pathology alone, the Ryan Lochte thing happened and I don\'t think Americans are viewed well there, and I would\'ve had to have Dr. C fly to Rio to testify - at my own expense and then I\'d have to pay thousands for his testimony if he even agreed to do it which is asking a LOT - most doctors won\'t even testify in cases down the street.) So, I dropped it, but I got some info in the process, like that statement... and I spent some money that didn\'t really go anywhere, but it was an avenue I wanted to explore at the time.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Page:
  • 1
  • 2