TOPIC: Macrolane: Injection technique

Poor technique in my opinion.

How does Macrolene compare to say HA price wise?

It is HA. It a very cheap HA.

As has already been said , its a very cheap HA proruct and it has many problems one of the main reasons that no doctor used it anymore and its out of used... People alwayes find for cheapy ways to enlarge the penis but they dont get it that its dangerous , my opninon is if you want to enlarge your penis and ready to go all the way than go with the best and take into consideration that you will have to spend money on that , and sometimes alot this is life if you want something good and good results you will have to pay for it plain and simple
Rule number 1 dont be stingy...

Hi, again, Aleksk,

This was one of the articles that got me started. And I knew someone who got Macrolance breast augment in Singapore( I had to dissolve lumps in the breast with Hyalase).

Not impressed with the technique - rough, big cannula (both of which maybe dont matter) but why only cover the top of the penis and look like a turtle shell? I know some injectors are concerned about the under surface being closer to the urrethra (urine passage) but it is much deeper in.

And for using 3.5 - 4 x the volume I would use of Voluma it has not made that much more difference. As the skin is effectively dissected off I would be worried it is more free to move around and clump up or drop down like a ball in a sock.

Macrolane is not available in many countries and has been removed from quite a few.

I just wish Voluma came in a 5 ml syringe ( at the price of 3 ml).

@ Dr. Oates
Thank you for your critique of this procedure. I remember you stating on this board that you would share a video with us showing your technique. Are you getting that ready for us?