So this study may not be lying, but that is in no way saying that this study is representative of the general population. This study is just representative of well...those who participated in the cocksizecontest .
Anybody who\'s taken a basic statistics class knows the notion of \"self-selection\". That is, the people who are even willing to participate are already not of the norm people.
I mean, just look at the criteria:
To complete a 'realtime' comparison, users must meet face-to-face with another user of
www.cocksizecontest.com
to compare cock size. This is not a measurement that occurs over webcam. This is an actual in-person meeting, which also must be photo-verified. We will take the sizes of realtime-verified users to be the 'gold standard' sample for cock size measurement for three reasons: 1) There is a very high incentive for users to report their own highest measurement. 2) There is a very high incentive for users to force their opponents to admit to as small a size as they can. 3) Meeting in person to compare provides a very high level of accountability with little room for cheating.
I\'m not sure about you guys, but I personally think that the average male would not be comfortable doing the aforementioned in bold. I sure as hell would never do this. Those who are even thinking about participating in this contest are those that believe they may have chances to win the \"contest\" against the other person. Which means they think they have a big cock. So this study is careless self-selecting people who already believe they have a big cock, and so the sample is definitely going to be skewed towards the more hung people.
7X5.5 could be the average.....but just of those people who participated in the study or representative of people in the world who truly think they have a big cock.
Anyway, that\'s my spiel. Haven\'t taken a stats class in... a long while.