Thundersplace also has a vast number of men who have obtained gains through stretching/traction alone. Lengthening surgery seems like a gimmick to me. Example:
Scenario 1
Bob stretches for 3 months without surgery, sees a 1
Inch gain.
OR
Bob has surgery, recovers, then stretches for 3 months, sees a 1.2
Inch gain.
Bob is lucky he\'s witnessed
Erect gains at all, but was an additional 0.2\" gain worth the risks of surgery and the high costs? Could those 0.2\" have been obtained from another 3 months of stretching?
Scenario 2
Bob was unlucky and his surgery left him with scar tissue giving him a net loss in length of 0.3\" inches.
Bob now spends the first 3 months trying to return to his original size, all while enduring the stress of post-op complication(s).
Bob now must spend additional months gaining net positive gains, none of which are guaranteed.
There is no scenario that suggests Bob will ever see gains that are dramatically greater than forgoing surgery. So that said, why not stick strictly to manual PE? Many reports at Thundersplace suggest that if manual PE doesn\'t work for you, you might want to consider modifying it until it does (observe physiological indicators, etc). And if manual PE in no way shape or form works for you, don\'t fool yourself into believing lengthening surgery will yield enough of an
Erect gain (let alone any) to warrant the risks & costs. Just my 2 cents.