I read about 3-4 threads of bad 30% results & fluid collection under the shaft, etc...
I have been through 4 years of hellish stuff with my
Dick (see progress report) - so I think maybe 30% is not the best risk / reward for me...
Then again, people say the first round gives the most gains and you can get things fixed in R2. I just don\'t know what to think... I still have a de-gloving scar (not sure how that will affect things) and even some pain left from my Peyronie\'s surgery. I retract a LOT - 3\" roughly... which never seems to go well for guys. It seems like 30% is adding a lot of risk - which is something I don\'t really want to deal with. Honzee\'s results were awesome at 30% but he had the last suppply of linnea safe...and his penis has been worked on through PE for a long time.
If the difference between 30 and 10 is truly 0.3\" on average...but triple the complications, I really don\'t think 30 is for me... but then a 4.75\" result is kinda lame for all this travel and time off and money, etc... agh this decision is crazy.
Also, I can\'t figure out if my skin is tight or loose or if my circ scar is low or high - I don\'t know how people make these assessments really. I think my skin is actually kinda loose bc my internal penile structures have shrunk (the tunica itself won\'t expand fully due to Peyronies) - but the outer skin is still the size it was from my original penis before Peyronies... and loose skin is usually a problem with the 30% crowd.
The date is coming up - time flies. I\'ll post things later in my log... I need to take viagra for all the \"100% comparisons\" due to bad EQ, and my new insurance doesn\'t cover it - so I hate wasting it for photos only.
What if I asked for 30% but just lower CCs? Or should I just insist on 10% due to all the crap i\'ve had to deal with for the last 4 years?