@smalljay
What\'s amusing (and almost impressive, though it was clearly done out of desperation) is the extent he went to break down
PMMA\'s potential issues. But I suppose you have to be well-versed in
PMMA in order to find ways to exaggerate or (leave out) information while trying to make it appear credible & legit.
A good example is how the Doctor cites the lack of FDA approval for
PMMA\'s use in soft-tissue augmentation. This is presumably referring to Artefill, which FDA\'s approval cites the correction/smoothening of the nasolabial folds of the face. But if we wish to use this argument, we must point out that the Doctor\'s own implant isn\'t FDA approved for penis enlargement either, but instead for the cosmetic correction of soft tissue deformities. One of his own talking points against
PMMA can be used against his implant!
But he\'s clever. Making a page that seems to discuss
PMMA in a comprehensive manner citing studies and such gives the appearance of legitimacy to the unfamiliar reader. And for this reason, it\'s pretty messed up!
Also, if it wasn\'t already apparent, the majority of his would-be patients are opting to go over the border. He\'s trying to give his failed implant some renewed legitimacy but I\'m not sure why he doesn\'t realize that it is almost impossible to do if the product doesn\'t work! I\'ve noticed online with his new website, his (embarrassingly silly) Youtube videos of supposed patients, and his continued release of newsletters with raffles & prizes that he\'s hellbent on being the world\'s best phallo-doc, despite there being plenty of work for him elsewhere in
Urology!