TOPIC: Comparing Gains with 10% vs 30% Concentrations

This shows an amazing difference in the amount of collagen produced by CC of PMMA, not PMMA + carrier. For those, like me, who really believe in the importance of getting the most gains for the least amount of PMMA, this really is significant.

According to briceps data, the 10% produces 2.3 times as much PMMA per bead. This strongly suggests that the beads with 30% are far too close together and this causes are denser collagen which is too hard and doesn\'t feel as natural. However, I find it hard to believe that it\'s as simple as that, as 10% doesn\'t seem to build (it\'s not very good for second rounds). So I wonder if it\'s a case of in part the body reacting more fiercely to foreign body when it first detects it. Which would suggest that maybe in 5% would work.

Great data mining, thanks!!!

I think AGE has a lot to do with formation and amount of collagen growth, as well as general health/genes of course. But for me, I did notice that I heal slower as I aged. In my twenties, almost any small cut will heal in a few days, less than three days or so. Now, it takes a week or so for a similar cut to heal...

These stats are amazing, one of the best posts on this entire forum... thanks so much bricep.

@hulk - gotta be nice to see yourself at the top of the leaderboard, I know its not a competition but if it was, you just won gold you big-Dick bastard!

I agree with mustang it would be interesting to know how age relates to volume increase. For example how old is brunoxxx? He had a 63% volume increase from a single session, that\'s a staggering result.

While gains per bead of PMMA are substantially more with 10%, in real unweighted terms the greatest gains are with 30%. In fact volume gains are well in excess of 50% greater with 30% than 10%.

I\'m coming from Australia, so you can add minimum $1000 to the cost of the procedure without even considering the time cost so I\'m asking for the biggest volume increase I can get.. if Dr C is willing, I\'ll take all the 30% my Dick can take for round 1.

@el6 I definitely want people to draw their own conclusions from the data, but I think that it is incorrect to only look at the total Girth gains of one over the other.

It should be taken into consideration that those who got 30% received an avg of 6 cc more than those receing 10%. Calculating this difference back into the 10% numbers will reduce the variance. Granted, even after adjustment 30% numbers do look to be greater.

For example, if you adjust irishfan down by 6cc, his gain would drop from .75\" to about .59\"

Looking at hulk, if you decreased him down by 6cc, his gains would show to be around .74\" from .98\"

Likewise, if you added those 6cc to pmmaalltheway, his gains would theoretically rise from .63\" to .86\"

I wish I could account for the variance in cc received.

el6eg4 wrote: These stats are amazing, one of the best posts on this entire forum... thanks so much bricep.

@hulk - gotta be nice to see yourself at the top of the leaderboard, I know its not a competition but if it was, you just won gold you big-Dick bastard!

I agree with mustang it would be interesting to know how age relates to volume increase. For example how old is brunoxxx? He had a 63% volume increase from a single session, that\'s a staggering result.

While gains per bead of PMMA are substantially more with 10%, in real unweighted terms the greatest gains are with 30%. In fact volume gains are well in excess of 50% greater with 30% than 10%.

I\'m coming from Australia, so you can add minimum $1000 to the cost of the procedure without even considering the time cost so I\'m asking for the biggest volume increase I can get.. if Dr C is willing, I\'ll take all the 30% my Dick can take for round 1.

Ehhh it helps to see that but I just had a bigger starting point.


But ill take gold where I can

Wow, looks like I\'m at the tail end of the chart for Round 1. Luckily, round 2 was with a 20% blend and my gains were over double what they were in Round 1.

I\'ve been absent since last August but I do need to get an update on my post-round 3 results. It\'s been nearly a year since I had round 3 so things are pretty much static now.

So, what the status with Dr C right now? What material is he using or are their options, and if so which is best? Is he giving options on concentration now?

I\'m thinking of doing a round 4 soon so I\'m in need of a catch-up.

Thanks, briceb, for the effort pulling all this together!

this is so awesome.. I\'m so glad i found this site