Tommygun wrote:
but that this hasn\'t happened yet in the 6 years they\'ve been doing it.
Look. 'We know of several people that have had \"complications\" with Dr C.
If you ask Wade, \"The Front Office\" or Dr C, they say that, \"there have been no complications\". 'Do not ask the review-ee for a review.
There may very well been several cases that we are not aware of.
I think it depends on what you define as a \"complication\". If it includes Nodules and uneviness, yes there are definitely many cases of that on this board',...but I believe 'Dr. C\'s office is upfront with the possibility of these occurring. In in fact you are told to expect irregularities. That\'s 'what the touch-ups are for.They have said there haven\'t 'been any serious complications such as
Necrosis and granulomas
as as as yet.At this point in time,
PMMA is a pioneering PE procedure. It may well have long term disastrous effects...But so far, it seems to have a good short term success rate. There have been a few cases that red flags have been risen. One that springs to mind was Soma, and thankfully it was brought under control...Another is Coolhandluke\'s case, which I believe isn\'t so serious' Gultzmaster\'s recent development is also cause for concern but seems to be being managed.
From 'what I have seen on the site and my personal experience , Dr. C\'s office has been honest and professional. We have threads that encourage guys to talk about any issues or complications.I have followed every
PMMA case on this site and I know the history.I agree that we should be cautious about trusting cosmetic doctors at face value, but to say that Dr. C\'s office is lying or not being completely 'truthful about the track record and the potential risks of
PMMA is not true (in my opinion).' ' '