Hey guys - newbie here. Been lurking for several weeks, trying to gather as much data as I can before taking the plunge. I\'m confident that
PMMA is the route to go, but am waffling between doctors. Dr. C seems to be at the top of the leaderboard, but I\'m working internationally for the next year or two, and am much closer to Dr. N in Prague / Seville, who uses 30% x 2 applications, and 10% for touch up as needed at third. I like what I\'ve heard about Dr. C, but have one reservation: It\'s been stated that he uses a 20% concentration of Newplastic. As Mustang2020 astutely observed in the
PMMA Complications thread, there is no 20% concentration of Newplastic. He either custom mixes, or uses an \"off-brand\". This is reinforced by the fact that his office is not enthusiastic about showing the actual product - labels, bottles, etc (same thread). That speaks volumes to me. I hope I\'m wrong. The reason for my concern was expertly addressed by coolhandluke - to paraphrase his explanation - mixing concentrations in an office setting will not yield the same accuracy as a concentration mixed at the lab under strict quality control conditions. A \"home brew\" will not be suspended uniformly, and subsequently, will result in an uneven deposition of
PMMA particles once the water-based delivery vehicle has been absorbed, resulitng in contour irregularities as collagen forms around the
PMMA particles. The point of my rambling is this: with Dr. C\'s focus on 10% primary application, 20% secondary and tertiary, is that considered better than the SA / EU approach of straight 30% for two sessions then 5 or 10% for touch-up? If so, why? I understand the aesthetic goals, but isn\'t that offset by the potential risk if in fact a custom mix is used that could yield untoward results? Sorry for the lengthy epistle. I am astounded by the breadth and depth of knowledge on this board, and am glad to be a participant. Any and all feedback is most welcome. Cheers - HB