thick_skull_skinny_dick wrote: I definitely agree that it's amazing to be able to even have this option (and to have it look pretty damn good/realistic from a lot of the pictures I've seen), but it does seem a bit exorbitant for how long it lasts, like justin8 mentioned. But to your point, Skeptical_One, this is our one and only Dick, so this is definitely not something to get cheap about.
Just to give some context to the argument, I make about $150k USD with no debt or kids, so I live a pretty comfortable life, but this still seems too expensive for me considering that 1) $5k seems to be on the low end, it actually looked closer to $7-10k to have any noticeable results and 2) I'd have to spend that every 1-2 years for the next ~30-40 years. So let's say it costs $7.5k to get the results you want and then assume the best case that it last the full 2 years, that's ~$112k over 30 years!! That makes the permanent/one-time penis enlargement surgery look like an absolute bargain! But that's obviously a lot scarier/riskier.
Does it ever get to a point where you don't need as much filler per session/it gets cheaper?
Agreed, definitely don't be cheap about your penis or its health!
I'm glad you brought up a number comparison. I'll be honest, $100k over 30 years is a pretty modest proposition when a $100,000 for a luxury sports car will be paid over 5 years and not last nearly half as long... both effectively producing comparable effects.
Rather than multiplicative number comparisons, let me offer a perspective using division. Suppose we go with a mid-range lifespan of
HA and a mid-range price of 18 months for $7,500. That amounts to ~$400 a month to stay BIG. That's what I pay for groceries for myself every month, and you're telling me I can flex a Magnum XL at the same rate??
I'm not downplaying its costs, but I will remain firm that
a specialty elective cosmetic procedure that's easily life-changing for many is at very reasonable market value today, and will continue to get better in the coming decade.
As for the permanent-vs-temporary considerations, you make precisely the point why temporary has gained so much popularity. While many are comfortable with the risks of permanence, the reality is that complications (albeit quite rare) are tougher to manage if & when they do arise. Temporary fillers,
especially with HA, are quite manageable. Not only is it reversible to some extent, but its lack of permanency means you'll eventually see it all or mostly gone one day if you were truly unhappy with your results (and not worry about the "tattoo effect"). Also, let's not forget that
Hyaluronic Acid is only one of two fillers (the other being fat transfer) that is derived from naturally-occurring sources.
Also, to your question regarding whether it gets cheaper over time,
it can and it does. You see, typically your first round will involve the foundational layer of filler which you'll build on or top-off at the rate at which your body breaks down filler.
Here's an example timeline to consider:
- Let's say you gain 1 Inch of circumference after your first appointment of HA.
- Suppose you happen to be less lucky than others and your body dissipates filler quicker-than-average, leaving you with a net 0.5 inches after 12 months.
- When you go for your Top-Off appointment, you'll only need enough volume to regain 0.5 inches, not a whole 1 Inch. Less volume = less filler = typically less cost.
- Furthermore, there will be some trace collagen as a result of having filler injected in repeatedly which will integrate and allow you to retain a foundational Girth you can build upon in the future.