Toothman wrote: I apologize for the way I come across. My emotions are all over the place. This whole outcome has put me in a very dark place.
To answer your question I am a dentist ( 4 years at large highly regarded state school, 4 years dental, 1 yr hospital residency, extensive continuing education in fillers and I have had an extensive medical education. I have been in practice for 20 hrs. I have read, exhaustively, many medical papers and journals, about every filler out there, including complications. Unfortunately, I trusted a board certified derm in US that does many filler procedures and she told me she has done quite a few of these. I trusted her and failed to do adequate research. I just want everyone considering PMMA to know, and hear directly from someone suffering it’s ill side effects, that there is a real and irreversible risk. Furthermore, when the temporary “fix” of steroid shots for granuloma fails, surgery is only option. Surgeons in US that do this difficult work are very expensive and hard to come by. That is why I am a proponent of only HA, because it is reversible and natural. This site is very informative and I am thankful for that. I have contributed my money and journey for others education. I feel, however, that positive outcomes (albeit possibly short term) are praised and the negative outcomes tend to be glossed over. I am just presenting the other side of the coin. Shouldn’t a discussion board allow this? Please don’t attack me for openly and informatively expressing my medical opinion and my life experience. One can take what I say with a grain of salt. I have insulted and attacked no one. No one on this board has “pissed” me off either. I would like Dr C to comment on my last post if possible. Dr Oates, Dr Solomon?
We can all learn from each other.
I sense that you are dealing with a lot and I genuinely hope you and anyone in a similar situation end up with the best case scenario. I've read all your posts on the old forum and am well acquainted with your past, so pardon me if my rebuke was harsh. I just wanted to to tone down the misplaced alarmist rhetoric. I also didn't appreciate the suggestion that anyone is being attacked because they disagree with you, or choose to defend the merits of
PMMA, and I hope we can move past those kinds of remarks.
This forum is intended to be a place for all former, current, and prospective patients of
Phalloplasty. I intentionally named a forum category "the Patient Support Group" so that men knew this was an anonymous online sanctuary to connect, share, vent, and learn. Presenting your side of the coin is not only welcomed, but encouraged. Half of the Moderation team were patients of botched procedures. I brought on Dr.
Solomon as a Sponsor largely due to his work in fixing procedures that went wrong. I've spent years exchanging emails with lurkers (members who don't post publicly) about ways to fix their penile issues, who to see, and what to expect. Trust me, all sides of the coin are welcome here.
If I didn't want "negative" or "critical" reviews of
PMMA I'd simply ban or delete the topics. Furthermore, I have no financial incentive in promoting
PMMA as I have other Sponsors who perform alternative procedures like
Ellanse,
HA, fat transfer, and Surgimend. For full disclosure, I did have
PMMA performed on me over 8 years ago and a few follow-up rounds in the years that followed. I've had zero instances of complication since.
As for glossing over negative reviews, we'll have to agree to disagree. What's truly glossed over is how the current generation of
Phalloplasty candidates are mostly unaware of what came before them and how much worse things were in the industry. Up until this past decade, men were discussing either dermal graft matrices (still viable with proper technique and graft), silicone oil/gel, PLGA scaffolds, fat transfer, and a rigid silicone implant. The success rates were abysmal and the nature of the complications associated were severe (i.e. length retraction due to scar formation, nerve damage and loss of sensation, impotence, infection, and
Necrosis). By comparison,
PMMA (and similarly
Ellanse) have exhibited considerably better complication rates, and the nature of those complications are relatively minor compared to complications of old. This may explain why there appears to be a "glossing over" of less-than-stellar
PMMA reviews--> they're infrequent and seldom ever as severe as to warrant a threat to penile function and health.
That said, discussions of potential complications and the means to address them are always a relevant discussion topic, just as they have been since this forum's inception. I hope Dr. C continues to chime in, I'm also very curious about the idea that granulomas can "disappear." Is it possible they could disappear indefinitely or is there an inevitability of their return?
.